| Home | About Us | Demos | Library | In the News |
An employer may allow additional benefits or relaxed eligibility requirements for individuals with one or more health conditions (e.g. diabetes, cancer, etc), at the employer’s discretion. An employer may not reduce benefits or in any way discriminate against employees with adverse health conditions.
Where an employer wishes to give additional benefits to employees in a given class who have a chronic or serious health condition that may increase their healthcare costs (e.g. diabetes, organ transplant), the employer simply creates an additional class for those participants within the class who have a health condition(s). HRA regulations allow employers to create classes of similarly-situated employees within an HRA plan, and vary the financial contributions and benefits provided to participants in each class.
Example: An employer has an HRA with three classes of employees, Drivers, Managers, and Executives, that each receive $100/month, $200/month, and $325/month HRA allowances respectively. The employer wishes to give 50% higher level of HRA allowances to Drivers and Managers who have a health condition or who have a family member with a health condition. In this example, the employer would set up two additional classes of employees, called Drivers+ and Managers+ (the “+” denotes a different class for participants with health conditions), and the monthly HRA allowances for participants in the Drivers+ and Managers+ classes would be set as $150/month and $300/month respectively.
Employees with health conditions are legally allowed to receive increased HRA benefits, but discrimination against employees with health conditions is prohibited. Multiple methods exist to administer higher levels of HRA benefits for HRA participants with health conditions, and no opinion is expressed or implied herein that any particular method is better than any other. Employers are advised to consult with their own benefits counsel.
Example Implementation
Zane Benefits advises that employers not copy an exact list of qualifying medical conditions from their state risk pool or use language that implies a person is getting higher financial benefits because of their acceptance into any government-subsidized health programs such as Medicaid or a state risk pool.
See also HIPAA 29 CFR 2590.702 which gives detailed rules for establishing classes, and subsection (g) specifically allows giving increased benefits to participants with adverse health factors (though decreasing benefits based on a health factor is strictly prohibited).